Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Bibhas Ranjan De, J
Madhuri Banerjee & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. non-compliance with required procedural provisions led to application being reviewed. (Para 2) |
| 2. court's responsibility in verifying allegations before proceeding. (Para 3) |
| 3. affidavit support is essential for validity of complaints before filing fir. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court quashed proceedings due to lack of compliance. (Para 6) |
| 5. ruling allows for resubmission under proper legal channels. (Para 7 , 8) |
Item 16.07. IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA No. 2025 CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
04 APPELLATE SIDE Ct 32 CRR 5355 of 2024 rup Madhuri Banerjee & Ors.
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Kalyan Kumar Chakraborty, Mr. Gopal Krishna Sarkar. … for the petitioner.
Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Mrs. Debjani Sahu. … for the State.
Mr. Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Supreem Naskar, Ms. Jayashree Patra Ms. Ritushree Banerjee, Mr. Bhaskar Mondal. … for the O.P. No.2.
1. All the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties to this revisional application are present.
2. All the parties are ad idem of the fact that in this case a complaint was lodged under Section 156 (3) of the Cr. P.C. (Section 175(3) of BNSS) which lacks compliance of Section 154 (1) and 154(3) of the Cr.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
