2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 3242
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Kausik Chanda, J
Laxmi Narayan Food Products (Unit II) – Appellant
Versus
West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited – Respondent
WPA 15365 of 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Arindam Banerjee
For the Respondents: Mr. Sujit Sankar Koley
The Court has the authority to regulate payment terms for tax discrepancies while ensuring uninterrupted service.
Headnote:The petitioner, engaged in operating a flour mill, contested an erroneous electricity duty demand of ₹1,85,29,330.85 following a prolonged exemption period that exceeded five years as per government circulars. The Court directed the petitioner to liquidate the outstanding amount in instalments of ₹2,60,000 per month starting August 2025, ensuring continued electricity supply during payment.
West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Mr. Arindam Banerjee Mr. Samriddha Sen Mr. Anirban Ghosh …for the petitioner Mr. Sujit Sankar Koley …for WBSEDCL The petitioner is engaged in operating a flour mill. It is not in dispute that he has been regularly paying his monthly electricity bills to the West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (WBSEDCL).
It appears that, by a letter dated April 3, 2025, the petitioner was suddenly directed to pay a sum of ₹1,85,29,330.85 (Rupees one crore eighty-five lakh twenty-nine thousand three hundred and thirty and eighty-five paise) on account of “wrongly exempted electricity duty amount.”
Mr. Sujit Sankar Koley, learned counsel appearing on behalf of WBSEDCL, submits that in accordance with prevailing government circulars, the petitioner was entitled to an exemption from electricity duty for a period of five years from the commencement of his business. Accordingly, the exemption was granted from July 17, 2010, to July 17, 2015. However, due to inadvertence, the exemption continued to be granted even beyond the permissible period. Consequently, the impugned demand dated April 3, 2025, was issued, requiring the petitioner to remit the amount that had accrued owing to the erroneous continuation of the exemption beyond the five-year term.
Mr. Arindam Banerjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, fairly submits that the petitioner is willing to pay the aforesaid amount of ₹1,85,29,330.85, but seeks liberty to do so in suitable instalments.
In light of the respective submissions and without adjudicating the issue of whether the claim raised under the letter dated April 3, 2025, is barred by limitation, this Court disposes of the writ petition with the following direction:
The petitioner shall deposit a sum of ₹2,60,000 (Rupees two lakh sixty thousand) per month, in addition to his current electricity bills, commencing from August 2025, until the entire outstanding amount of ₹1,85,29,330.85 is fully liquidated.
It is clarified that so long as the petitioner continues to make payments in accordance with this order, the electricity supply to his premises shall not be disconnected.
With the above direction, WPA 15365 of 2025 stands disposed of.