Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Partha Sarathi Sen, J
M/s. Sterling Finvest Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties represented by advocates. (Para 1) |
| 2. petition for issuance of writ regarding land notifications. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments on land classification presented by both parties. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 14 , 16) |
| 4. court found insufficient grounds for petitioner's claims. (Para 15 , 18 , 20) |
1. The writ petitioner and the respondent authorities are represented by their learned advocates.
2. By filing the instant writ petition the writ petitioner has prayed for issuance of appropriate writ/writs against the respondent authorities for not giving the effect of notification dated 31.03.2006 of the East Kolkata Wetlands (Conversion and Management) Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Act’ in short), which was came into effect retrospectively on and from 16.11.2005.
3. In course of his submission Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner at the very outset draws attention of this Court to page nos.39 to 119, being copies of five registered deed of conveyance as have been executed in favour of the present writ petitioner.
4. It is argued by Mr. Chakraborty that from the schedules of the said registered deeds of conveyance it
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
