Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J
Avik Shaw & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Infoport Trading (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
1. This is an application for recalling the order dated 17th July, 2025 passed by this Court in CO No 405 of 2025. It is submitted by the Learned Advocate representing the petitioner of this application and the O.P. No 2 in the civil revision case that the matter was taken up for hearing on 17th of July,2025 under the heading ‘Motion’ but unfortunately at the time of hearing the Learned Advocate representing the O.P. could not appear as a result the revisional application is disposed of and allowed without hearing the Opposite Party.
2. It is further submitted that on multiple occasion in the daily cause list the matter appeared under the heading motion and on all such earlier dates prior to 17th July, 2025 the learned advocate representing the petitioner duly appeared and the matter stood adjourned either at the behest of this petitioner/Opposite Party or at the instance of the pe
Inherent powers to recall orders exist but only for valid grounds; absence of representation alone does not justify such recall.
Applicants must comply with mandatory deposit requirements for recall of ex parte decrees under Section 17(1) of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act; non-compliance renders the application incompet....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of a fair hearing and the adverse consequences of an order for the parties involved.
The court emphasized that applications for recalling orders must demonstrate sufficient cause, which was not established in this case.
Power to recall any witness under Order 18 Rule 17 of CPC can be exercised by Court not to fill up lacunae in evidence of witness which has already been recorded but to clear any ambiguity that may h....
Failure to show good cause for non-appearance and lack of diligence in pursuing the case can lead to the dismissal of an application under Order 9 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Code.
The court has the discretion to recall a witness for the purpose of marking documents, but this discretion should be exercised judiciously and only when there is a good reason to do so.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article