CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J
Sima Sengupta – Appellant
Versus
Avik Sengupta – Respondent
RVW 303 of 2024 | S.A. 351 of 1995
In the judgment and order dated 22nd April, 2025 the following corrections be made.
In the appearance portion, the name of “Dr. Dudra Dhar” be replaced by ‘Dr. Rudra Dhar’.
In the 3rd line of paragraph 1 at page 2, the phrase “having any knowledge or consent or notice to” be replaced by the phrase “the knowledge or consent of or notice to”.
In the 4th line of paragraph 1 at page 3, the word “remain” be replaced by the word “remained” and in the last but one line of the same page the word “to” be inserted before the word “an”.
“sengupta” be replaced by the word “Sengupta” and in the thirteenth line of the same paragraph, the phrase “of respondents,” be replaced by the phrase “of pro forma respondents” and the phrase “of other appellant” be replaced by the phrase “of the other appellants”.
In the 3rd line of paragraph 2 at page 5, the word “respondent” be replaced by the word “opposite party ” and in the last line of the same page the phrase “the plaintiff” be replaced by the phrase “the array of plaintiffs”.
In the 1st line of paragraph 2 at page 6, the phrase “opposite parties herein” be replaced by the phrase “opposite party Nos. 1-4 herein”.
In the 7th line of paragraph 2 at page 7, the phrase “opposite parties herein” be replaced by the phrase “opposite party Nos. 1-4 herein” and in the 9th line of same paragraph, the phrase “plaintiff decides” be replaced by the phrase “plaintiffs decide” and the word “descending” appearing in the 10th line of same paragraph be replaced by the word “dissenting” and in the 13th line of same paragraph, the phrase “the respondents” be replaced by the phrase “the pro forma respondents”.
“opposite party herein and the respondents” be replaced by the phrase “opposite party Nos. 1-4 herein” and the 5th line from the bottom, the word “seized” be replaced by the word “ceased”.
In the 2nd line of paragraph 1 at page 9, the word “never” be replaced by the word “ever”, in the 2nd line of paragraph 2, the phrase “known the’ be replaced by the phrase “known to the” and in the 10th line of the same paragraph, the phrase “opposite parties” be replaced by the phrase “opposite party Nos. 1-4 herein”.
In the 2nd line of paragraph 5 at page 10, the word “applications” be replaced by the word “application”, Let this order be treated as part of the judgment and order dated 22nd April, 2025.
Office is directed to make necessary corrections in the judgment and order dated 22nd April, 2025.
Certified copy, if already supplied, be corrected accordingly.
Urgent photostat copy of the order, if applied for, be supplied to the petitioner on priority basis.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.