Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Partha Sarathi Sen, J
Sri Goutam Chowdhury – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to land acquisition under expired legislation. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on compliance with statutory notice requirements. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. court's position on invalidity due to procedural failures. (Para 10 , 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. order for new proceedings and compensation timeline. (Para 17 , 21) |
1. The parties to the instant writ petition are represented by their respective learned advocates.
2. By filing the instant writ petition, the writ petitioner has prayed for issuance of appropriate writ/writs against the respondents/authorities, more specifically, against the respondent no. 2/authority to initiate a proceeding under Act XXX of 2013 on account of utilization of the land of the writ petitioner, particulars of which have been mentioned in paragraph no. 2 of the instant writ petition.
3. At the time of hearing, Mr. Roy, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner at the very outset draws attention of this Court to Page No. 4 of the report as submitted on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 4/authorities. It is submitted by Mr. Roy that from the said report, it would reveal that the aforementioned land of the writ petitioner was acquired by th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
