CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Partha Sarathi Sen, J
Sri Goutam Chowdhury – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondent
1. The parties to the instant writ petition are represented by their respective learned advocates.
2. By filing the instant writ petition, the writ petitioner has prayed for issuance of appropriate writ/writs against the respondents/authorities, more specifically, against the respondent no. 2/authority to initiate a proceeding under Act XXX of 2013 on account of utilization of the land of the writ petitioner, particulars of which have been mentioned in paragraph no. 2 of the instant writ petition.
3. At the time of hearing, Mr. Roy, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner at the very outset draws attention of this Court to Page No. 4 of the report as submitted on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 4/authorities. It is submitted by Mr. Roy that from the said report, it would reveal that the aforementioned land of the writ petitioner was acquired by the respondents/authorities under Act II of 1948 by publication of notice under Section 4(1a) in the Gazette.
4. It is further submitted by Mr. Roy that from Page No. 5 of the said report, it would reveal further that the Deputy Secretary to the Government of West Bengal, Department of L & LR & RR & R directed the Specia
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.