1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By the impugned order, two applications were decided.

3. By the latter portion of the order, an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) filed by the principal defendant nos. 1 and 2 / opposite parties for adducing further evidence was allowed; whereas, by the earlier portion of the impugned order, an application for amendment of plaint filed by the present plaintiff / petitioner was dismissed.

4. The plaintiff/petitioner has challenged the earlier portion of the order whereby her amendment application was rejected.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the learned trial Judge adopted a hyper-technical approach in dismissing the amendment application primarily on the premise that the same was filed at an advanced stage of the suit.

6. It is submitted that the amendments sought were innocuous.

7. Learned counsel appearing for the principal defendant nos. 1 and 2 / opposite parties contends that by the proposed amendment, the plaintiff seeks to change the entire charac