SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 3507

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, Tapabrata Chakraborty, JJ
Sangita Jana – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Others – Respondent
MAT 491 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Shuvro Prokash Lahiri, Mr. Rajesh Naskar, Mr. Ronit Mukherjee, Mr. Ankan Mondal
For the Respondents: Mr. Syed Samsul Arefin, Mr. Nilufar Alom Siddiqui, Mr. Sourav Mitra

Statutory authorities must act within the limits defined by law, and procedural riders that are not explicitly stated in regulations cannot be imposed.

Headnote:(A) West Bengal School Service Commission (General Transfer, Transfer on Special Grounds and Reallocation) Rules, 2015 - Notification dated 3rd January, 2022 - Appellant's claim for transfer not considered as the single Work Education teacher - Learned single Judge erred in imposing a rider requiring consideration of a willing teacher from neighboring schools despite no provision for such in the notification. (Paras 10-14)

(B) Duty of statutory authority - It is a fundamental principle that a statutory authority can act only in the manner permitted by the statutes; amending regulations clarified that steps must be taken urgently without waiting for a willing substitute. (Paras 15-18)

Facts of the case:
Appellant sought transfer as the only Work Education teacher in her school. The application was contested, leading to the impugned order which imposed unnecessarily burdensome conditions contrary to the rules.

Findings of Court:
The order of the learned single Judge is modified to direct the District Inspector of Schools to strictly follow the notification and complete the necessary arrangements within three months.

Issues: The main issue involved was the interpretation of the statutory duty of the District Inspector of Schools regarding teacher transfers as outlined in the amendments to the rules.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the learned single Judge's order was flawed as it required the unmandated step of finding a willing teacher first, modifying it to direct immediate action in line with the original notification's intent.

Result: Appeal allowed with modifications.

The present appeal has been preferred challenging an order dated 28th November, 2024 passed by the learned single Judge in the writ petition, being WPA 27600 of 2024.

As we have invited the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties to advance their arguments on merits of the matter, the delay in filing the present appeal is condoned and the application under Section 5 of the Limitation of Act, being IA No.:

CAN 2 of 2025, is disposed of.

Records reveal that the appellant’s claim for transfer was not considered since she was the single Work Education teacher in Delugram Mankur Bakshi Girls’ High School. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant preferred the writ petition. Upon contested hearing, the said writ petition was disposed of by the order impugned observing inter alia as follows:

‘Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties writ petition stands disposed of directing the respondent no. 5 to make an endeavour to find out willing teacher of neighbouring school who can man the post of the petitioner temporarily till regular incumbent joins the post. If willing teacher is available and if it is found by the respondent no. 5 that the issue relating to the transfer of the petitioner is a “fit case” in terms of notification dated 3rd January, 2022 transfer order shall be passed in favour of the petitioner’.

Mr. Lahiri, learned advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the notification dated 3rd January, 2022 casts a duty upon the District Inspector of Schools (SE) [hereinafter referred to as the DI(SE)] to take urgent step in a time-bound manner to search for a teacher on the same subject from nearby and make local arrangement so that the teacher of the other school attends the school wherefrom the teachers has applied for transfer on days of the week on a temporary basis till such time a permanent teacher subject joins.

He argues that it is a fundamental principle that a statutory authority can act only in the manner he is permitted by the statutes. There is no provision in the notification dated 3rd January, 2022 to invite any option or choice of any other teacher to volunteer in rendering service to a school from which the appellant seeks transfer. As such, the learned single Judge erred in law in incorporating a rider to the effect that the DI(SE) has ‘to make an endeavour to find out willing teacher of neighbouring school who can man the post of the petitioner temporarily till regular incumbent joins the post’. Such argument, as urged, was glossed over by the learned single Judge and no finding was returned on the same. Reliance has been placed upon a judgment of a co-ordinate Bench of this Court delivered in the case of Gokul Chandra Mallick Vs. The State of West Bengal & Others [MAT

1218 of 2024].

Mr. Arefin, learned advocate appearing for the State/respondents submits that the learned single Judge has directed consideration of the appellant’s claim in the light of the notification dated 3rd January, 2022 and there is no infirmity in the order impugned.

Mr. Mitra, learned advocate appearing for the Commission submits that no allegation has been levelled against the Commission in the writ petition.

We have heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and considered the materials on record.

The West Bengal School Service Commission (General Transfer, Transfer on Special Grounds and Reallocation) Rules, 2015 [hereinafter referred to as the 2015 Rules] were amended from time to time and the last amendment was effected vide memo dated 3rd January, 2022. The operative part of the said memo runs as follows:

“In that event a single subject teacher makes application for transfer, the SMC will not reject the application and inform the DI (SE) about such application. The DI (SE) will immediately discuss the matter with the CSE in the DI (SE) will take urgent step in time bound manner to search for a teacher on the same subject from nearby and make local arrangement so that the teacher of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top