CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Debangsu Basak, Prasenjit Biswas, JJ
Vaidhai Agarwal @ Sonu Kumari Kedia – Appellant
Versus
The Indian Bank (Erstwhile Allahabad Bank) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court reinforces statutory remedy against section 13(4) measures. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. final ruling on the dismissal of appeals based on lack of merit. (Para 16 , 17) |
Vaidhai Agarwal @ Sonu Kumari Kedia For the Appellant in M.A.T. 1019 of 2025 : Mr. Sumitava Chakraborty For the Appellant in M.A.T. 1020 of 2025 : Mr. Sudip Deb, Sr. Adv., Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya Ms. Ipsita Ghosh For the Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Shiv Mangal Singh For the Respondent Bank : Mr. Sauradeep Dutta Ms. Himadree Ghosh For the Respondent Nos. 5, 7 to 9 : Mr. Subhrangshu Panda Mr. Snehasish Dey For the State in M.A.T. 1019 of 2025 : Sk. Md. Galib, Sr. Govt. Adv., Mr. Abu siddiqui Mallik For the State in M.A.T. 1020 of 2025 : Mr. Washim Ahmed Ms. Sujata Mukherjee Heard & Judgment on : August 7, 2025 DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-
1. Two appeals are taken up for analogous hearing as both emanate out of the judgment and order dated July 8, 2025 passed in W.P.A. 15135 of 2025.
2. M.A.T. 1019 of 2025 is at the behest of an heir and legal representative of a guarantor. The appellant is to be treated as a guarantor of the credit facilities that the borrower which is the appellant in M.A.T. 1020 of 2025 enjoyed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.