IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Debangsu Basak, Md. Shabbar Rashidi, JJ
VIJAY PRAKASH BOHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
1. Appeal is directed against an order dated August 18, 2025 passed in WPA 11575 of 2025.
2. Appeal is at the behest of private respondent in the writ petition.
3. Learned advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant purchased an immovable property in a proceeding under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 . He submits that actual physical possession of such immovable property was not made over to the appellant by the Bank.
4. Learned advocate for the appellant submits that the Bank filed an application under Section 14 of the Act of 2002 on February 18, 2016. Such application was dismissed by the jurisdictional District Magistrate by an order dated March 27, 2025.
5. Learned advocate appearing for the appellant submits that, Bank filed a writ petition being WPA 11575 of 2025 praying for setting aside of the order dated March 27, 2025 and seeking a direction upon the jurisdictional District Magistrate to issue an order under Section 14 of the Act of 2002. Learned Single Judge erred in not issuing such direction on the jurisdictional District Magistrate.
6. Learned advocate appearing for the appel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.