Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Bivas Pattanayak, J
Syed Mosharaf Hossain – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in appointment directly affecting petitioner's entitlement to benefits and service eligibility noted. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 2. arguments from both sides relative to appointment issues presented. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. court confirms entitlement to notional benefits to correct procedural lapses of authorities. (Para 11) |
| 4. implementation of court's orders for compliance highlighted. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
1. Supplementary Affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.
2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks direction upon the respondents to grant notional benefits to the petitioner from the date i.e. 31st August, 2007 on which initial appointment letters were issued to the successful candidates.
3. The petitioner contends that the petitioner, upon being sponsored by the employment exchange against the vacancies under the different panchayat samities in the district of Bardhaman in the year 2005, appeared in a written test held on 8th January, 2006. After qualifying in the written test, the petitioner was called for interview for appointment to the post of „Panchayat Karmee‟ on 13th July, 2007. The petitioner stood first in the panel prepared for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
