Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Saugata Bhattacharyya, J
Bholanath Mondal – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court observation on service and representation of parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's transfer application based on child's medical needs. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. final ruling on procedural requirements and timelines. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
1) Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.
2) In spite of service of notice, authorities of Shibnagar Mokshada Sundari Vidyamandir (HS), South 24 Parganas (hereinafter referred to as “said school”) being respondent nos. 7 to 9 are not represented today.
3) Petitioner made transfer application in prescribed format on 24th February, 2025 since son of the petitioner is suffering from heart disease. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on receipt of transfer application said school authority has not issued “No Objection” as a result whereof subsequent steps till date are not taken by the District Inspector of Schools (SE), South 24 Parganas being respondent no. 6.
4) Since it is submitted that son of the petitioner is suffering from heart disease, said school authorities being respondent nos. 7 to 9 are directed to issue “No Objection” for transfer of the petitioner by making necessary endorsement on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
