Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
GOUTAM KUMAR CHATTERJEE, J
DO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL& ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. state's inconsistent policy on headmasters' benefits examined. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's challenge against authority's erroneous pay fixation. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 3. court's ruling on lack of justification in classification. (Para 21) |
| 4. state required to rectify illegal deductions and restore benefits. (Para 22 , 23) |
2025 APPELLATE SIDE WEDNESDAY WPA 30529 OF 2024 Court : CB-07 Item : DL-07 Bench : SINGLE GOUTAM KUMAR CHATTERJEE Matter : WPA Status : DO VS.
ID : 266057 AR : NANDY THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL& ORS.
MR. MD. MANUWAR ALI, ADVOCATE ……for the Petitioner MR. MD. NURE ZAMAN, ADVOCATE MS. ANIMA CHAKRABORTY, ADVOCATE …...for the State
1. The instant writ petition is yet another instance of the inconsistent stand taken by the State regarding the grant of additional benefits to the Headmasters of upgraded schools.
2. Initially, the Education Department decided to extend such benefits to the Headmasters of all upgraded schools, but subsequently revised its position and restricted the benefit to Headmasters of schools upgraded after a particular cut-off date. This change in stance led to disputes concerning the grant of retirement benefits to those Headmasters. The pres
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
