Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Madhuresh Prasad, Biswaroop Chowdhury, JJ
Soumyendra Nath Banerjee – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. role of c.a.t. as the primary forum for service matters. (Para 1 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. details of disciplinary proceedings and outcomes before c.a.t. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. disposal of writ petition without expressing opinion on merits. (Para 5 , 11 , 12) |
1. Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The writ petitioner approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Kolkata Bench (hereinafter referred to as the ‘C.A.T.’) by filing an Original Application, being aggrieved by a memorandum of charges dated 27.12.2019; and the orders passed by an enquiry officer dated 29.01.2021 and 02.03.2022. The petitioner’s O.A. was rejected by the C.A.T. by an order dated
27.06.2023.
3. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the order of the C.A.T. dated 27.06.2023 passed in O.A. No. 572 of 2022.
4. During the pendency of the present writ proceedings, the petitioner was allowed an opportunity of submitting his comments against the report of the enquiry officer, and after submission of such comments a final order has been passed by the disciplinary authority on
24.04.2025 in the following terms:
“9. AND NOW THEREFORE, on the basis of the alle
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
