CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J
Kaushik Mitra – Appellant
Versus
Indira Ghosh – Respondent
Mr. P. K. Mukherjee, Sr. adv, Mr. Debanik Banerjee, Mr. Hazaifa Shahid ……for the Opp. Parties. 1. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the plaintiff no.2/opposite party no.1, Ms. Indira Ghosh has died and the learned Trial Court vide order dated May 19, 2025, has, inter alia, held that suit against Ms. Indira Ghosh stood abated.
2. In the circumstances, let the name of the opposite party be deleted from the cause title.
3. Leave is granted to learned Advocate on record for the petitioner to amend the cause title.
4. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 4.5.2022, 11.5.2022 and 14.06.22. The facts in brief as canvassed by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner is that a suit was filed by the opposite parties against the petitioner herein. In the said suit, the defendant/petitioner after filing the written statement was proceeded ex parte by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 06.12.2018.
5. This order was challenged before this Court in C.O. 3670 of 2019 unsuccessfully. The review application filed against this order also met the same fate. The SLP filed before the Apex Court also got rejected. Thus, the ex parte order against the pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.