1. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated September 22, 2022 thereby the learned Trial Court extended the interim order till November 25, 2022.

2. Learned Counsel submits that the interim order was initially granted on September 29, 2021. Learned Counsel submits that learned District Judge granted the stay mechanically and the same is liable to be set aside. Learned Counsel submits that even no application under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was filed.

3. At the outset, the present petition is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed. enacted with a solemn Legislative intention for speedy disposal of case relating to arbitration. The Constitutional Courts have time and again recorded that there should be minimal judicial intervention in the case pertaining to Arbitration and Conciliation Act . The reason behind such orders is that if the parties have decided to get their disputes resolved by an Arbitrator, the Court should be slow in interfering into the same.

4. Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act has been specifically enacted confining the extent of judicial intervention. Section 5 reads as under :

“5. Extent of