CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J
Debashish Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Barsa Majhi – Respondent
1. Supplementary affidavit filed be kept with the record. The civil revision has been preferred challenging an order No.13 dated 22nd July, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Serampore in Money Suit No.26 of 2021, rejecting the petitioner’s application for amendment of the plaint. Vide the order under challenge, the learned Trial Judge was pleased to reject the petitioners prayer for amendment of the plaint on the following findings:
“Considering the submission advanced by the Id.
Lawyer of the parties to the suit, I have perused the materials on record, wherefrom it appears to me that plaintiff by this proposed amendment petition is firstly rectify the classification of suit land from Bastu to Pukur. Secondly, he intends to insert the fact about the jointness of the property of Sarmishtha Dutta, Diganta Dutta, Debashis Dutta in place of exclusive ownership of plaintiff. Thirdly by this proposed amendment petition plaintiff also intends to implead the Sarmishtha Dutta as proforma defendant no. 10 and Fourthly, by this proposed amendment petition he intends to incorporate the fact that the property is looked after by Diganta Dutta on behalf of other owner.
On go
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.