Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Apurba Sinha Ray, J
Sukanta Mondal – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments regarding the basis of allegations and implications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. state's position on the evidence against the petitioners. (Para 3) |
| 3. judicial considerations for quashing based on allegations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. final decisions on allowed and rejected prayers for quashing. (Para 7) |
1. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in GR Case 1515 of 2023 pending before the learned Judicial magistrate, 1st Class, 2nd Court, Hooghly, Sadar arising out of Balagarh Police Station Case No. 241 of 2023 dated 01.06.2023 under Sections 4 98A , 406 of IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 , in fact the allegations are baseless and the relevant proceedings including charge-sheet should be quashed under Section 4 82 of Cr.P.C . It is also submitted on behalf of the petitioners that a bare perusal of the allegations levelled in the written complaint it would be clear that the same contains concocted, vague, general and omnibus allegations without mentioning of any time line of the alleged incident or incident.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has submitted several judicial decisions
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
