SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 3891

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Rajasekhar Mantha, Ajay Kumar Gupta, JJ
Bijay Kumar Shaw and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Howrah Municipal Corporation and Ors. – Respondent
MAT 996 of 2025 | CAN 1 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kalyan Bandyopadhyay, Arka Kumar Nag, Rahul Kumar Singh, Snehasish Dey
For the Respondents: Sandipan Banerjee, Ankit Sureka, Mukul Lahiri, Prasenjit Burman, Payel Keloy, S. Mallik, Ratikanta Pal

Unauthorized construction endangers tenants' lives; developers must ensure safe relocation and compensation.

Headnote:(A) Municipal Corporations Act - Unauthorized construction - Court ordered demolition of a building constructed without a sanctioned plan; concerns regarding structural safety raised - Appellants faced eviction with threat to their lives and were in need of alternate accommodation - Developer ordered to relocate tenants and compensate them, while the municipal corporation directed to lodge a police complaint against builder for endangering lives. (Paras 4, 8, 11, 12)

(B) Rights of Tenants - Tenants living in danger due to illegal constructions and their rights regarding safe housing highlighted, with necessary conditions imposed to secure their lives and provide compensation. (Para 10)

Facts of the case:
Appellants, tenants paying rent, faced eviction due to illegal construction of buildings; in dire need of safe housing as demolition order was pending for over a year.

Findings of Court:
The court held that the appellants/tenants must be relocated safely and compensated without further delay due to the precarious conditions posed by unauthorized construction.

Issues: The court delved into the balance of protecting tenant rights against illegal construction and the need for swift municipal action to save lives.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the principle that builders and the municipal corporation must ensure tenant safety, holding them accountable for unlawful actions jeopardizing lives.

Result: MAT 996 of 2025 disposed of with specific directions [to promote tenant welfare and ensure accountability].

Table of Content
1. unauthorized construction raised significant safety concerns. (Para 2 , 3)
2. court confirmed prior demolition orders due to instability. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. tenants face severe risks needing immediate relocation. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. compensation and relocation ordered for affected tenants. (Para 11)
5. final orders for compliance and no costs. (Para 14 , 15)

1. Affidavit of service filed in Court is taken on record.

2. The ugly head of illegal nexus between the builders/owners and some officials of the Corporations, in the instant case the HMC, is raised in these proceedings.

3. There is admittedly, unauthorized construction of a buildings which are standing at premises No. 35/9, 30/9 and 9 Hamiduddin Munshi Lane, Howrah.

4. There is admittedly an order passed by a Single Bench in a writ petition before this court ordering demolition of the said buildings since it is an unauthorized construction. No sanctioned plan has been obtained from the Howrah Municipal Corporation in this regard. Learned counsel for the Howrah Municipal Corporation confirms the same in Court today.

5. Against the order directing immediate demolition of the unauthorized construction, an appeal being MAT 204 of 2023 was filed by one Dharmendra Shaw, the developer who constructed the said building. The land in respect of one premises owner is stated to be Om Prakash Jaiswal. The other two plots of land are owned by persons who claimed to have entered into a development agreements with Dharmendra Shaw.

6. The Division Bench considering the plight of Mr. Bandypodhyay’s client before this Court by orders dated 17.02.2023, 03.03.2023 and 11.04.2023 deferred the demolition to ascertain the structural stability of the three buildings in question. Some photographs annexed to the stay application reveal a sordid and dangerous picture where portions of the roof have already caved in. The appellants are poor and illiterate persons who have moved into the three said premises and are paying rent to one Biswanath Jaiswal, the brother of Om Prakash Jaiswal.

7. Mr. Mukul Lahiri, learned Advocate for the respondent no.8 submits that his client has no terms with the said Biswanath Jaiswal.

8. After giving several opportunities to the Howrah Municipal Corporation to locate a person who will be able to assess the structural stability of the buildings, it was found by the Coordinate Bench that the Corporation was leading this Court into the garden path. Finding no alternative and no way to ascertain the structural stability of the building and given the fact that the three constructions are illegal and unauthorized, demolition has been ordered by the Coordinate Bench finally on

11.04.2023 in MAT 204 of 2023.

9. Mr. Lahiri indicates the Court that two other tenants from time to time have filed writ petition, prevent the demolition of the unauthorized constructions. The said writ petitions have been dismissed by two Single Benches of this court.

10. This Court notes that client of Mr. Bandyopadhyay is facing a grave choice today, i.e. between devil and deep sea. If they continue to live in the said buildings, there may be a threat to their lives and if they have to leave, they have no place to go.

11. In the backdrop of the above and given the fact that the demolition of the unauthorized constructions have been ordered way back in April, 2023, and no demolition has taken place till now, this Court directs as follows :-

a) Dharmendra Shaw, the developer shall relocate the appellants/tenants in three premises to a separate place at the first instance which is safe and sound and pay compensation.

b) The actual liability for recovering or sharing compensation may be appropriately decided by and between Mr. Dharmendra Shaw, the developer and Om Prakash Jaiswal and Biswanath Jaiswal either mutually or by civil proceedings.

c) The quantum of compensation to the appellants shall be decided by the Commissioner, Howrah Municipal Corporation and/or his delegate.

d) The Chairman, Howrah

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top