Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Gaurang Kanth, J
Chandra Pratihar – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. authority must address termination validity before reinstatement. (Para 2) |
| 2. challenge to termination without notice (Para 3) |
| 3. prior court order necessitates reconsideration of representation. (Para 4) |
| 4. failure to follow established legal processes renders decisions invalid. (Para 6 , 7) |
1. Affidavit-of-service is taken on record.
2. The petitioner by way of the present writ petition, challenges the order dated 19.11.2024 passed by the Mission Director, West Bengal State Urban Livelihood Mission and Director, State Urban Development Agency, whereby the petitioner’s prayer for reinstatement to a contractual post under the respondent-municipality was rejected. While rejecting the prayer the authority granted liberty to the petitioner to apply for a suitable position, if and when any post is published subject to fulfillment of all necessary procedures and criteria, the case of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law.
3. This is the second round of litigation. The petitioner was initially engaged as a ‘Community Organizer’ of Arambag Municipality under the erstwhile programme of Swarna Jayanti Shahari Rojgar Yojana (SJSRY) presently known as National
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
