Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
DR. AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE, J
MONOJIT DAS – Appellant
Versus
SUKUMAR TA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tenant's application structure and grounds of eviction (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contestation of payment claims and procedural compliance (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's examination of evidence and decision-making process (Para 5 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. implications of non-compliance with tenancy laws (Para 13 , 15) |
| 5. final order regarding the civil revisional application (Para 16) |
1. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the tenant/defendant/petitioner herein and is directed against order no.90 dated August 20, 2024, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court at Serampore, Hooghly, in Title Suit No.211 of 2019.
2. The petitioner is a tenant under the opposite party in respect of the suit premises and the opposite party herein as plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit praying for eviction of the petitioner/defendant from the suit premises on the ground of default in payment of rent, reasonable requirement of the landlord and the damage caused by the tenant. The plaintiff/opposite party, in his plaint, alleged that the petitioner/defendant made default in payment of rent since October, 2000 and an arrear amount of rent of Rs.78,768/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
