Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.

1. Though this matter is appearing under the heading “Extension of Interim Order”, since the interim order expired long back, the parties were allowed to make submissions on merits of the civil revisional application. Accordingly the learned advocate for the respective parties advanced their argument on the main civil revisional application and the same is taken up for hearing by treating the same as on the day’s list with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties.

2. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendant nos. 1, 2 and 3 and is directed against an order being no. 33 dated July 26, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1^st Additional Court at Contai, Purba Medinipur in Title Suit No. 118 of 2021.

3. By the order impugned the application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the plaintiffs/opposite party nos. 1 and 2 herein for amendment of plaint stood allowed.

4. Mr. Mukherjee, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the prayer of the opposite parties for amendment of plaint on an earlier occasion was rejected