CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J
Srimatya Kalpana Dolai & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Sri Tapan Kumar Dolai & Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion about the merits of the civil revisional application and the context of interim orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. assessment of trial judge's decision on allowing amendments and its implications. (Para 3 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments regarding the introduction of contradictory claims and the admissibility of admissions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. final ruling on the amendment application requiring specific judicial review. (Para 16 , 18) |
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.
1. Though this matter is appearing under the heading “Extension of Interim Order”, since the interim order expired long back, the parties were allowed to make submissions on merits of the civil revisional application. Accordingly the learned advocate for the respective parties advanced their argument on the main civil revisional application and the same is taken up for hearing by treating the same as on the day’s list with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties.
2. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendant nos. 1, 2 and 3 and is directed against an order being no. 33 dated July 26, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior D
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.