Mr. Syed E. Huda …..For the petitioner Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay Ms. Tapati Samanta Mr. Arindam Ghosh ….For the State Mr. Anindya Bose Mr. Golam Mohiuddin Mr. Mridul Biswas ….For the added party Mr. Huda, learned counsel for the petitioner frankly submits that the petitioner was directed to use opposition against CAN 1 of 2025 and CAN 2 of 2025. The petitioner was very seeks so he could not appear before this court. Accordingly, the opposition has not prepared. However, Mr. Huda also frankly submits that the intending intervener is a person in favour of whom the respondent authority earlier granted license. So he may be a necessary party in this writ petition.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent authority submits that this court has passed an interim order directing the respondent authority not to issue license till the disposal of appeals pending before the Hon’ble Division Bench being WPA 1543 of 2024. State was unaware about the said interim order but has issued the license in favour of the intending intervener on 24th of February, 2025. Thereafter the State authority has come to know about that order and the license issued in favour of the intending intervener