SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 4098

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Tirthankar Ghosh, J
All India Lawyers Union – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
WPA 15756 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sujit Moitra, Mr. Taj Mohammad, Mr. Samim Ahammed, Mr. Rajit Lal Moitra, Mr. Tapas Kr. Maity, Mr. Subhrajit Saha, Ms. Anjana Mehebub, Mr. Malay Bhattacharya, Mr. Siddhartha Sankar Mandal, Mr. Ashish Santra, Mr. E. Islam, Mr. Arka Ranjan Bhattacharya
For the Respondents: Mr. Kishore Datta, ld. AG, Mr. Swapan Banerjee, ld. AGP, Ms. Sumita Shaw, Mr. Tarun Kr. Chatterjee, Mr. Diptendu Narayan Banerjee, Mr. Soumen Chatterjee

Proper notification and service of legal documents must be ensured for the court proceedings to be valid.

Headnote:This judgment involves the interpretation of court orders regarding service of a writ petition. The essential facts include the petitioners directing service upon specific respondents. The court directed service to be executed and required a report on acknowledgment of receipt before the next hearing. The main issues included procedural adherence and ensuring all parties were notified for the upcoming date. The court reasoned that failure to complete service would not hinder the hearing. The petition was scheduled for review on 17th July, 2025.

R e Affidavit-of-service so filed be kept with the record.

The petitioners are directed to hand over a copy of the writ petition to Mr. Soumen Chatterjee, learned advocate for the State. Learned advocate for the State would, in course of the day, through Police Station (formerly known as Anandapore Police Station) effect service upon the respondent nos. 5 and 6 respectively. It should also be brought to the notice of the respondent nos. 5 and 6 that the writ petition will be heard on

17th July, 2025 at 1.15 pm.

This is in addition to the communication which has been enclosed as an Annexure by Mr. Ahamed, learned advocate for the petitioner, wherein, it has been claimed that by way of e-mail, a copy has been sent to the respondent nos. 5 and 6 respectively.

In case, the private respondent nos. 5 and 6 are not available on the next date so fixed, this court would proceed with the merits of the writ petition by hearing the Petitioner as well as the Learned Advocate General who is appearing on behalf of the State.

Let a report be furnished before this Court on 17th July, 2025 by the Station (formerly known as Anandapore Police Station) regarding acknowledgement of receipt of the writ petition.

List the writ petition on 17th July, 2025 at 1.15 under the same heading.

Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top