Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
AMRITA SINHA, J
ABARNA DUTTA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
DHAVAL JAIN & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. no third party intervention in contempt proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. court observed no willful violation and redirected the petitioner to appropriate forums. (Para 3 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court concluded by dismissing the contempt petition and promoting forum access for relief. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
1. Both the applications have been filed seeking intervention in the contempt proceeding. The applicants allege that if the Court interferes with the order that has been passed by the Special Officer (building), then the rights of the applicants will be infringed.
2. Learned advocate representing the contemnors submits that the Executive Engineer dealt with the matter and forwarded the same to the Special Officer (building) allegedly in compliance of the direction passed by the Court.
3. On the last occasion the Court framed an issue as to whether the applicants have a right of audience in the contempt proceeding.
4. Judgment delivered by this Court in the matter of Tandon Brothers Vs. Rajesh Pandey & Anr. reported in 2008 SCC OnLine Cal 10 : (2008) 2 CHN took note of the order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in Nalini Ranjan Das Vs. Anup Singh , reported
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
