SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 4193

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Saugata Bhattacharyya, J
SUBRATA KABIRAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS – Respondent
WPA/13560/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Jakir Hossain, Mr. Soumen Barman
For the Respondents: Mr. Ram Mohan Pal

Pension benefits under the Pension-cum-Gratuity Scheme are to be awarded from retirement date if option exercised timely and conditions fulfilled.

Headnote:In this case, the petitioner, a retired teacher, sought benefits under the Pension-cum-Gratuity Scheme following the guidelines established by the State notifications and judgment of the Special Bench. The court found that the petitioner fulfilled the necessary conditions including timely option exercise and directed the issuance of a revised pension order effective from the retirement date. The main issue framed was the impact of timely refund and option exercise on the pension start date. The court ruled by applying the precedent that benefits should start from the retirement date when conditions are met.

Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.

Petitioner is a retired Assistant Teacher in Madrasah who superannuated on 28th February, 2013 and got the benefit under the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme (CPF). Subsequently, petitioner exercised option to come under the Pension-cum-Gratuity Scheme in terms of Government notification dated 13th June, 2014 which was issued in terms of the judgment of the Special Bench dated 16th July, 2013 passed on intra court appeal being APO No.94 of 2009 (State of West Bengal &

Ors. –vs- Abhijit Baidya & Ors.).

It has also been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as per demand of the State respondents petitioner has deposited the amount along with interest and additional interest which petitioner received under CPF Scheme.

However, the grievance of the petitioner is after taking steps in terms of the said notification dated 13th June, 2014 by issuing pension payment order dated 14th May, 2015 pensionary benefit was sanctioned in favour of the petitioner not from the date following the date of petitioner’s retirement but from the date of refund which petitioner made after exercising option in terms of the said notification dated 13th June, 2014. Petitioner claims issuance of revised pension payment order thereby sanctioning pensionary benefits from the date following the date of petitioner’s superannuation based on the judgment of the Special Bench dated 30th September, 2019 passed on intra Court appeal being APO No.121 of

2007.

The State respondents are represented by learned advocate who has also submitted that based on the judgment dated 30th September, 2019 of the Special Bench the benefit of pension is accorded to other similarly circumstanced retired teachers from the date following the date of their superannuation provided exercise of option has been made within time in terms of said notification dated 13th June, 2014 and if the refund is made by the concerned teacher as per the calculation of the State respondents.

This Court has heard the learned advocates representing the parties and has perused the relevant materials available on record. It appears that the petitioner did exercise option within time in terms of the said notification dated 13th June, 2014 and the petitioner on duly exercising option in terms of notification dated 13th June, 2014 switched over from CPF to Pension-cum-Gratuity Scheme . On placing reliance on paragraph 55 of the judgment of the Special Bench dated 30th September, 2019, this Court does not find any impediment in extending the benefit of pension to the petitioner from the date following the date of petitioner’s retirement provided exercise of option is made within time and refund has been made as per the calculation of the State respondents.

Accordingly, this Court directs the State respondents to issue revised pension payment order in favour of the petitioner within twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order thereby extending the benefit of pension from the date following the date of petitioner’s superannuation.

With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top