SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 4522

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
PAREKH ALUMINEX LTD. & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
VENUS ORCHARDA PVT. LTD. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION Appellate Side Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta C.R.R. 3048 of 2015 With CRAN 3 of 2016 (Old No. 1336 of 2016)

With CRAN 4 of 2016 (Old No. 4841 of 2016)

Parekh Aluminex Ltd. & Anr.

Versus Venus Orchards Private Limited For the Petitioners : Mr. Tarique Quasimuddin, Adv.

Ms. Sanchita Chaudhuri, Adv.

Ms. Syed Khafiz Zamar, Adv.

Heard on : 17.04.2025 Judgment on : 18.06.2025 Ajay Kumar Gupta, J:

1. By filing this Criminal Revisional application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CrPC’), the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the proceeding being Complaint Case No. C-6501 of 2013 filed under Sections 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ‘N.I. Act’) pending before the Court of the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 15th Court at Calcutta.

2. The brief facts, leading to filing of this instant Criminal Revisional application, are as under:

2a. The petitioner no. 1 is a registered company under the Companies Act, 1956 and petitioner no. 2 is the Company Secretary of petitioner no. 1/Company, M/s. Parekh Aluminex Ltd. The petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top