SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 4728

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY, J
APEJAY HOUSE PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COAL INDIA LTD. – Respondent
E.C. No. 16 of 2024 | C.S. No. 72 OF 2006



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Aritra Basu, Adv., Mr. Sanket Sarawgi, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Pradip Kumar Dutta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Abir Debnath, Adv., Mr. Pradipta Bose, Adv.

Execution of decree established proper mesne profit calculations, confirming obligations for payment by judgment debtor.

Headnote:(A) Civil Procedure Code - Execution of Decree - Application for execution of a decree passed previously to recover amount of mesne profits and possession - Various relief claims made under C.S. No. 72 of 2006 including eviction and assessment of mesne profits - Correct calculations of mesne profits contested by the judgment debtor - Court allows decree holder’s calculation of total Rs. 10,52,65,301/- with interest and adjusts for incorrect previous calculations about rate escalation. (Paras 1, 2, 6, 8, 10, 13)

(B) Mesne Profits - Calculation and escalation - Proper computation of mesne profits providing an annual increase and establishing correct rates per square foot as resolved in prior judgments - Appellate Court’s acceptance of Special Referee’s report demonstrating wrongful possession, upheld.

Facts of the case:
The decree holder sued for recovery of possession of premises and mesne profits, with previous judicial directives on calculating rent acknowledged by this Court. The report from a Special Referee was considered in final rulings (October 6, 2023) supporting the decree holder’s claims.

Findings of Court:
The Decree holder's calculations confirmed; judgment debtor to fulfill monetary obligations without dissolving assets.

Issues: Whether judgment debtor's proposed differences in calculations for mesne profits were valid, and treatment of GST in computations.

Ratio Decidendi: The ruling clarifies previously ordered payments were correct; adjustments due were upheld by the Court's review of calculations per agreed rates established in earlier judgments.

Result: Judgment Debtor directed to pay Rs. 5 crores before specified date.

Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.: This is an application for Execution of the Decree passed on October 6, 2023 and corrected by Order dated December 13, 2023 read with order dated December 15, 2023 passed by a Learned Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in C.S. No. 72 of 2006.

It is the contention of the Decree holder that the decree-holder filed the present suit being CS. No. 72 of 2006 inter-alia praying for the following reliefs:

a) Decree for peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted portion of the second floor of the premises No. 15 Park Street Kolkata-700016 more fully described in Annexure ‘A’.

b) Decree for Rs. 6, 99, 917/- on account of mesne profits;

c) Decree for further mesne profit @ Rs. 75 per squere feet per month on and from 21st March 2006 till recovery of possession along with interest @ 12% p.a;

d) Alternatively an enquiry into mesne profit and decree for such sum and at such rate as may be found due upon enquiry;

e) Interim interest and interest upon judgment @ 12% p.a.;

f) Receiver.

g) Injunction.

h) Costs;

i) Such further and/or other reliefs.

2) The Decree holder in the said suit applied for a summary decree by filing an application under chapter XIII A of the Original Side Rules of this Hon’ble Court being GA No. 1730 of 2006.

3) The application filed under Chapter XIII A of the Original Side Rules of this Hon’ble Court was allowed and an eviction decree was passed on July 14, 2009. In terms of the decree for eviction dated July 14, 2009, a Special Referee and/or Mesne profit Commissioner was appointed to inquire into the mesne profits which was due and payable by the judgment debtor to the decree holder on account of wrongful and illegal possession of the premises and to submit a report before this Hon’ble Court. The Learned Special Referee and/or Mesne Profit Commissioner entered upon reference and made and published his report on May 7, 2012.

4) The Judgment Debtor being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 14thJuly 2009 preferred an appeal before the Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court which was dismissed. Thereafter the Judgment Debtor preferred a Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the same was also dismissed.

5) On 15th September 2009 the Hon’ble Division Bench directed the judgment debtor to deposit Rs. 100,000/- per month as occupational charges which was to be kept in a short term fixed deposit in a Nationalized Bank. By Judgment and order Dated January 16, 2013 the Hon’ble Court passed an order that the occupation charges as paid by the judgment debtor would be subject to the finding of the Special Refree on the Mesne Profit and the decree holder also undertook to give adjustment to the amount lying in the fixed deposit with the total sum claimed herein towards the mesne profit.

6. The decree holder upon receipt of the report of the Learned Special Refree and/or Mesne Profit Commissioner filed an application before this Hon’ble Court being G.A. No. 8 of 2019 inter alia praying for the following reliefs.

a) delay if any in filing the present application be condoned.

b) Report of the Learned Special Refree being Annexure ‘C’ hereof dated 7th May 2012 be confirmed and final decree be passed in accordance therewith.

c) Ad-interim orders in terms of prayers above.

d) Such further and/or other order or orders be passed direction as directions be given as to this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.

7. The judgment debtor filed an application inter alia, taking exeption to the report dated May 7, 2012, made and published by the Learned Special Refree and/or Mesne Profit Commissioner.

8. The application of the decree holder and the judgment debtor were heard analogously by this Hon’ble Court and on September 6, 2023 and September 18, 2023 the decree holder’s application inter alia for confirmation was allowed and the judgment debtor’s application, inter alia taking exception to the report of the Learned Special Referee was dismissed by a judgment and decree dated October 6, 202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top