Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
A. K. Janah, J
Rolls Print Co. (P.) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
B. M. Singh and Son – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendant's arguments against plaintiff's claims. (Para 3 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. trial court's findings and observations. (Para 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 4. legal principles regarding partnership and tenancy. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. validity of notice to quit and manufacturing business. (Para 14 , 16) |
| 6. conclusion of the case and order. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
1. This appeal arises out of the decree passed by the City Civil Court, Calcutta in Ejectment Suit No. 1661 of 1965 in favour of the plaintiff B. M. Singh and Son, a firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act having its office at No. 1, Crooked Lane, Calcutta (hereinafter referred to as the firm) The defendant is Rolls Print Co. (P.) Ltd., a limited company under the Companies Act (hereinafter described as the Company). The plaintiff is the owner of the premises No. 1, Crooked Lane, Calcutta of which the suit premises we are concerned with is a part.
2. The plaintiff filed several suits against different tenants occupying the premises No. 1, Crooked Lane, Calcutta. With regard to the present suit the plaintiff's allegation is that the defendant was a monthly tenant under the firm in respect
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
