SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 15

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
S. K. Datta, J
Sibendra Nath Kanjilal v. Ganes Chandra Bas


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sudhis Dasgupta
For the Respondents: Mr. B. C. Datta

Table of Content
1. overview of the eviction case. (Para 1 , 2 , 6)
2. discussion on validity of notices. (Para 3 , 9 , 11 , 12)
3. arguments on notices and tenancy rights. (Para 4 , 5 , 8 , 10)
4. court's interpretation of tenant rights. (Para 17 , 20)
5. conclusion and ruling of the appeal. (Para 18 , 23)

1. This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 10th Court, Alipore in Title Appeal No. 1102 of 1974 setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned Munsif, 4th Court, Alipore in Title Suit No. 403 of 1972 and in effect dismissing the suit although the learned Additional District Judge has not made any express order to that effect. Such an omission ought not to have occurred in the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge.

2. Plaintiff filed the aforesaid title suit for eviction of the defendant from the suit premises and for recovery of mesne profits. It was the case of the plaintiff in brief that the defendant was the tenant under the plaintiff in respect of the suit premises at the monthly rental of Rs. 60/- according to English Calendar and that the defendant defaulted in payment of rent since M























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top