Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
M. G. Mukherji, NURE ALAM CHOWDHURY, MUKUL GOPAL MUKHERJI, JJ
Pawan Kr. Ruia v. S. P. C. B. I. (Economic Offence Wing) Calcutta
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations in fir disclose cognizable offences (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's authority limits at investigation stage (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial restraint on interfering with investigations (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. cbi's jurisdiction affirmed amid allegations (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. revisional application dismissed by court (Para 11 , 12) |
1. The petitioner Shri Pawan Kumar Ruia filed this revisional application for quashing the investigations and proceedings in Case Nos. RC / 12 / EOW / 86, RC / 13 / EOW / 86, RC / 14 / E / 86 and RC / I 5 / EOW / 86 all dated 17th December, 1986. All these proceedings were started under S.12 OB / 420/4681471 IPC and under S.5(1)(d) read with S.5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act , 1947 on the basis of four separate FIRs lodged by one Shri D. Kasiappan, Dy. General Manager of Tamil Nadu Marcantile Bank Limited, Calcutta. This revisional application was originally heard by a Division Bench of this court comprising of P. Khastgir and A.M. Sinha, JJ. the petitioner took the objection that the allegations made in the FIRs are not true and at any rate do not, prima facie, make out any cognizable offence and as such the FIRs and the investigations are liable
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
