SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Mr. Ray, J
Sanjoy Kumar Dutta v. West Bengal Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ray

Table of Content
1. petitioner is owner claiming trespass. (Para 1 , 2)
2. counsel argues for disconnection. (Para 3)
3. legal rights under electricity act defined. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
4. petition dismissed as misconceived. (Para 8 , 9)

1.The petitioner in this Art. 226 petition dated October 6, 2010 is seeking the following principal relief : -
''(a) A writ of or in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to forthwith disconnect the electricity of the private respondent No. 5 who is illegally enjoying the electricity in the premises of your petitioner;''

2. Admittedly, the fifth respondent, Bhusan Kumar Das, is an occupier of a portion of the premises. The petitioner claims that he is the owner of the premises, and that Bhusan is a rank trespasser. The petitioner filed a suit for Bhusan's eviction. The Civil Court made a decree for eviction. The decree has been put into execution. At such stage the petitioner has brought this petition.

3. Mr. Ray, counsel for the petitioner, submits as follows. Since Bhusan's appeal from the decree for eviction was rejected, the petitioner has acquired a right to call upon the West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company L






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top