CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, SHUKLA KABIR (SINHA), JJ
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Ultra Tech Cement Ltd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to penalty claims for overloading. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's interpretation of railways act sections on penalties. (Para 5 , 6 , 20) |
| 3. conditions for validating penalty claims. (Para 7 , 8 , 21) |
| 4. court's decision on the validity of claims post-delivery. (Para 12 , 22) |
| 5. legal arguments presented regarding arbitration and agreements. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
1. This appeal is directed against an order and / or judgment dated 30th July, 2009 passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge in W.P. No. 357 of 2006 and W.P. No. 358 of 2006. The question involved in the said two writ petitions was as to whether a claim may be made by the railways on account of overloading a wagon only prior to the release of the goods.
2. The facts revealed that the Petitioner Company is one of the largest manufacturers of cement and clinker. The said company uses railway wagons to transport raw materials to its manufacturing units and to carry its products to its customers or en - route to its customers. The writ petitioners challenged the several demands made by the railways on account of overloading charges and penalty thereon for the petitioner company, whether as consignor or as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.