SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 12

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Tapash Mookherjee, J
National Institute of Homoeopathy v. State of West Bengal and Others


Advocates:
For the Respondents: Mr. Tewari

Table of Content
1. details of the mandamus appeal's context and facts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. court reflections on the admissibility and effects of cut-off dates on candidates. (Para 6 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. discussions on previously adjudicated cases pertaining to educational admissions. (Para 8 , 14)
4. stating the court's clarified stance on the prohibition of mid-session admissions. (Para 9)
5. conclusion and summation of the judgment's outcome. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 22)

1. This Mandamus Appeal is directed against the judgment and / or order passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court on 12th March, 2014 in W.P No. 6225 (W) 2014 at the instance of the appellant which was figured as respondent No.7 in the writ petition.

2. By the impugned order, the West Bengal University of Health Sciences was directed to arrange for recounselling for filling up four (4) vacant seats of M.D. (Homoeopathy) course, 2003 in different Homoeopathy Medical Colleges affiliated to the said University. The concerned respondents were also directed to take steps with utmost expedition so that no further delay is caused in giving admission to the deserving candidates after holding appropriate recounsel


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top