Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Sahidullah Munshi, J
Sadhu Barman v. State of West Bengal
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against conviction for murder. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. confession and recovery of the body. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. inquest reports on the condition of the body. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. relative's evidence on disappearance. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. witnesses confirming recovery and identification of body. (Para 18 , 24 , 33 , 37) |
| 6. accused's claims of police torture. (Para 54 , 63) |
| 7. argument on the burden of proof. (Para 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 8. court's affirmation of conviction. (Para 97 , 102) |
1. This appeal is against a judgment dated 10th August, 2006, passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Dinhata, in Sessions Trial No.13 / June / 2003 corresponding to Sessions Case No.12/2002 arising out of Dinhata Police Station Case No.37/01 dated 22.02.2001, whereby the accused appellant has been found guilty and convicted of murder and of causing disappearance of evidence under S.302/201 of the Indian Penal Code and an order of sentence dated 11th August, 2006 whereby the accused appellant has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default whereof he is to suffer further rigorous impr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
