Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
, J
Tapan Sen v. State of West Bengal and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. determination of validity of control orders (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners' claim based on previous directives (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. argument against retrospective application of statutory instruments (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. vested rights arising from administrative recommendations (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. nature of authority's obligations in statutory processes (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. effect of repealing legislation on existing orders (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. rights based on previous court directions (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. examination of prior applications under changed statutes (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 9. conclusions on petitioners' claims and rights (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
1. The point which primarily falls for determination in this batch of writ petitions is the question as to whether a process of selection initiated under the West Bengal Public Distribution System (Maintenance and Control) Order, 2003 but not completed can survive and be guided by the said Control Order, subsequent to the promulgation of the West Bengal Public Distribution System (Maintenance and Control) Order, 2013. Both these Control Orders have been made under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 . The wr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
