Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Patherya, J
Saroj Banerjee v. State of West Bengal
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on fir and trial outcomes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. defense argued prosecution failed to prove charges. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. credibility of victim's testimony questioned. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 24) |
| 4. order of conviction set aside; appeals allowed. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
1. These appeals are directed as against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, 4th Fast Track Court at Barrackpore, District: 24 - Parganas (North) on 17.08.2006 and 18.8.2006 in respect of Sessions Trial No. 8(3) of 2005 arising out of Sessions Case No. 10 (12) of 2001 in which the Trial Court was pleased to convict both the appellants before us in respect of the Charge punishable under S.376 (2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code (Code) and both were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and they were also directed to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.
2. It may not be out of place to mention that both the appellants have already served out the sentence and as such our effort is almost academic in nature, in respect of appellant No. 2 but the appellant no.1 Saroj Banerje
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
