SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 24

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Md. Mumtaz Khan, J
Jahangir Seikh @ Naga Seikh v. State of West Bengal
Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 2002



Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. Sashanka Sekhar Ray
For the Respondent: Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury

Conviction upheld for grievous hurt under IPC 326, but quashed for attempted murder under IPC 307 due to lack of evidence of intent.

Headnote:(A) Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 307 and 326 - Offences of Attempt to Murder and Causing Grievous Hurt - Appeal against conviction - Assessment of evidence by trial court - Importance of eyewitness accounts and delay in FIR lodged considered - Court established conviction under S.326, but not under S.307 due to lack of intention to kill. (Paras 26-29)

(B) Delay in lodging FIR - Explained by the condition of the victim; not detrimental to the prosecution case. (Paras 14-16)

(C) Credibility of witness testimonies - Evidence from injured party given due weight - Interests of justice considerations not to disregard eyewitness testimony without substantial reasons. (Paras 20-21)

Findings of Court:
The appellant was convicted for S.326 for grievous hurt; however, conviction under S.307 was overturned for insufficient evidence of intent to kill.

Issues: Whether delay in filing the FIR affected the prosecution's case and if all elements for offences under both sections were proven.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that while grievous hurt was properly established, intent for attempted murder was not supported by evidence.

Result: Conviction under S.307 quashed; upheld under S.326.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case details the assault and injuries. (Para 1 , 2)
2. filing of fir and the initial response to the incident. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments questioning the prosecution's evidence and credibility. (Para 6 , 7)
4. counterarguments supporting the prosecution's conclusions. (Para 8 , 9)
5. analysis of evidence presented and documentation standards. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. court observations on fir delays and witness credibility. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
7. reevaluation of trials and witness testimonies. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
8. review of prosecution claims and witness reliability. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
9. discussion on the conclusions reached by the trial court. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
10. final determination regarding charges under ipc 326 and 307. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
11. court's final judgment and the disposition of the appeal. (Para 29 , 30 , 31)

1. This appeal is directed against order of conviction dated January 21,2002, of the appellant for commissioning of offences punishable under S.307/326 of the Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the IPC) and two separate sentences dated January 22, 2002, for commissioning of the above offences, i.e. to suffer rigorous imprisonment for eight (8) years and to pay a fine of Rs.3000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for further period of six months as also to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of four (4) years and to pay further fine of Rs.1000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for another period of four (4) months, respectively in Sessions Trial No. 1 of June, 2001 arising out of Sessions Serial No. 14/2001, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kandi, Murshidabad. The period of substantive sentences as recorded hereinabove were directed to run concurrently. In the event of realization of above fine, the same was directed to be paid to the injured person, namely, Jane Alam by way of compensation under the provision of S.357 of the CrPC. The detention of the appellant in pre (and post) trial period was directed to be set off in accordance with the provision of S.428 of the CrPC.

2. On April 23, 1996, at 09.00 hours, one Md. Jane Alam (PW 2, the injured person) went to field lying and situated at village - Masundi, J. L. No. - 14, Anchal No. - III, Sub Division - Kandi, District - Murshidabad for inspection of his above land. A quarrel took place there between him and the appellant in connection with digging of dyke on his land. Thereafter, he was returning home from his aforesaid land. Suddenly, the appellant assaulted the aforesaid injured person with a sharp 'henso' (sickle like weapon) on all over his body. As a result the above person fell down on the field with profuse bleeding from the injured portions of his body. He became senseless. His two brothers, namely, Md. Samsul Alam and Sabadi Sk, who had been working in their respective plots of land nearby, rushed to this spot hearing the screaming of the victim. The appellant fled away from the place of occurrence. The another brother of victim Md. Rafiqul Alam (PW 1, the de facto complainant) came to the place of occurrence within a short period of time. The aforesaid three brothers of the victim initially took him to the Bharatpur Block Primary Health Centre, District - Murshidabnad. Considering the seriousness of condition of the injured person, he was transferred to Kandi SD Hospital, District - Mushidabad. He was under treatment of the medical officer of the above Hospital (PW 6) for a period of 23 days as an indoor patient. According to the treatment papers issued by the above Primary Health Centre, he sustained following injuries: -
"1) A fresh lacerated cut injury present below the left ear on the upper part of the left side of the neck measuring 1 1/2" x 3/4" x 3/4".
2) Another fresh cut injury with laceration was present at the base of the left thumb measuring 1/2" x 1/4" left thumb amputation had done (left thumb not found). Active bleeding from the cut end present.
3) A








































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top