Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Debasish Kar Gupta, Mumtaz Khan, JJ
Chandi Mal and Others v. State of West Bengal
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the initial evidence presented by the prosecution indicates the circumstances surrounding the murder. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments centered around potential discrepancies and reliability of eyewitness accounts. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. the court raises doubts about the truthfulness of the prosecution based on evidentiary inconsistencies. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. the appeal culminates in the quashing of the conviction due to reasonable doubts. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
1. The subject matter of challenge in this appeal is the judgment and order of conviction dated December 21, 2004 of the appellants for commission of offence punishable under S.302/34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the I.P.C.) and sentence dated December 22, 2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Bankura in Sessions Trial No. 1 (6) 1996 arising out of Sessions Case No.6 (11) 1994 to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- each in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a further period of one year.
2. On May 27, 1992 Sri Akhil Chandra Malakar (PW 4) Probationary Sub-Inspector, att
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
