Priti Poddar and Others v. Pannalal Kashuka - 2017 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 36

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 36

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
, J
Priti Poddar and Others v. Pannalal Kashuka

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Banerjee
For the Respondents: Mr. Dutta

Table of Content
1. the basis of the plaintiff's ownership and claims in property law. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding lease claims and evidence. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18)
3. court's observations on the sufficiency of evidence. (Para 22 , 23 , 25)
4. final decision and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)

1. The present Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Asansol on 23rd May, 2000 in Title Appeal No. 2 of l997/12 of l987 whereby the learned Additional District Judge affirmed the judgment and decree passed on 18th November, l986 in Title Suit No. 78 of l981, by the then learned Munsif, Second Court, Asansol.

2. The substituted legal heirs of the defendants in the suit are the Appellants and the plaintiff in the suit is the respondent herein.

3. The plaintiff's case in the suit may be summarized as follows : -
The plaintiff was the legal owner of the suit properties detailed in Schedule 'A', 'B' and 'C' to the plaint and the plaintiff was in continuous possession of those properties. The defendants in the suit, took a portion of the aforesaid plots in a lease granted by the so

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2017 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 36

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT, JPriti Poddar and Others v. Pannalal Kashuka

Cases Referred (3)

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
, J
Priti Poddar and Others v. Pannalal Kashuka