SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 11

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
, J
Prabir Kumar Pal and Another v. Dilip Choudhury and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [not listed]
For the Respondents: [not listed]

Table of Content
1. establishment of claims based on contractual agreements and admissions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. judgment on admissions should have clarity on liability and authority. (Para 5 , 6 , 8)
3. judgment on admission necessitates express and unconditional admissions. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 12)
4. all trustees must be part of litigation involving trust liabilities. (Para 14 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. impugned judgment overturned for lack of basis on summary grounds. (Para 19 , 20)

1. A judgment dated 26th July, 2016 on admission and decree drawn up thereon, in respect of a Commercial Suit, being C.S. 23 of 2015, passed by a learned Single Judge of this High Court in G.A. 202 of 2016 has been challenged in all these three appeals.

2. Respondent no. 1 in each of these three appeals is the plaintiff in C.S. 23 of 2015. In that suit, respondent no.1 / plaintiff filed G.A. no. 202 of 2016 for passing of a decree on admission in his favour.

3. As per the cause title of the plaint of C.S. 23 of 2015, the defendant no. 1 is a company, defendant nos. 2 to 6 are private individuals, defendant no. 7 is a Trust, defendant no. 8 is a company and defendant no. 9 is a registered society. Among the said de



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top