Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
, J
Amalendu Ray v. Arati Ray and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the revisional application. (Para 1) |
| 2. legal basis for converting injunction applications. (Para 2) |
| 3. details of the partition suit and allegations. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. justification for appointing a receiver. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 5. court's discretion in the appointment of receivers. (Para 6) |
| 6. conclusion and verdict of the revisional application. (Para 8 , 9) |
1. This revisional application is filed by the Respondent No. 4 in Title Appeal No. 369 of 2006, filed before the Additional District Judge, 1st Court, Alipore, challenging an order no. 71 dated 26th May, 2017 by which an application for injunction is disposed of appointing receiver.
2. It is no longer res integra that an application for injunction can be converted into an application for receiver provided the circumstances warrant so and the ingredients for appointing receiver is discernable therefrom. This Court, therefore, does not find any illegality in the order appointing receiver on an application for injunction on the above settled legal parameters.
3. A suit is filed for declaration of share, partition and separation thereof. The said suit stood decreed in preliminary forum wherein the right of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
