SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 11

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
, J
Edward Keventer Private Limited v. Atanu Banerjee and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Senior Counsel
For the Respondents: Counsel

1. The instant revisional application arises out of a suit, instituted initially for partition, for declaration that the plaintiffs had fifty per cent share in the suit property and for consequential reliefs.

2. Subsequently the plaintiffs sought an amendment, inter alia seeking to introduce a declaration that the defendant nos. 1 and 2 had no right, title or interest to transfer the entire premises no. 20, Gopal Chandra Mukherjee Road, Kolkata - 2, exceeding their 50% of share, in favour of the defendant no. 6 who had not acquired any interest more than 50% in the said property by virtue of the said deed of conveyance dated 09.11.1992, and for incorporating the corresponding facts. The said amendment was allowed by a different portion of the order than that impugned herein.

3. On the other hand, the present petitioner, being defendant no. 6 in the suit, had filed an application under Order VII R.11, read with Order I R.10(2), of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking a rejection of the plaint as far as the said defendant was concerned and / or expunction of itself from the suit. The said application was rejected on contest. The present revision has been preferred by the defendant no






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top