Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Aniruddha Bose, J
Raj Kumar Dey v. State of West Bengal
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. murder due to previous disputes (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. validity and evidentiary significance of fir (Para 7 , 30 , 31) |
| 3. circumstantial evidence proves guilt (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. failure to explain last seen enhances guilt (Para 28) |
| 5. conviction affirmed and appeal dismissed (Para 32) |
1. The appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 21.01.2013 and 22.01.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, First Fast Track Court, Kandi, Murshidabad, in Sessions Trial No. 01 (March) 2012 arising out of Sessions Case No. 253 of 2011 convicting the appellant under S.302/201 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.) and sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for life and also to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years for the offence punishable under S.302 of the IPC and to suffer imprisonment for 7(seven) years and also to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/-(Rupees Two Thousand) in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence punishable under S.201 of the I.P.C.
2. The gist of the prosecution case as levelled against the appellant is t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
