SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6441

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Sanjib Banerjee, J
Sita Lahiri (Dec.) v. Nil
Probate Application No. 100 of 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [Name]
For the Respondents: [None]

The court upheld the validity of the Will based on the evidence of an attending witness despite the absence of attesting witnesses.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to the grant of probate for the last Will and Testament dated 21 May, 1980 of Sita Lahiri, wherein the Court examined the necessary legal stipulations under the Succession Act and the Evidence Act. The testimony of the attending witness, as well as the evidence presented by the petitioner, reinforced the validity of the Will. The absence of caveats from other legal heirs and proper publication of notices were noted. The primary issues framed included the validity of the execution under Section 63 of the Succession Act and the necessity of attesting witnesses explained under Sections 68 and 69 of the Evidence Act. The Court concluded that the Will stood proved and granted probate accordingly.

Table of Content
1. petitioner filed for probate under the last will. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. step taken to notify legal heirs and examine witnesses. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. testimony of not only the attesting witness but also the petitioner. (Para 8 , 10)
4. court assesses evidence for validity of the will. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. final ruling grants probate to the petitioner. (Para 15)

1. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of probate in respect of the last Will and Testament dated 21 May, 1980 of the deceased Sita Lahiri.

2. The deceased Sita Lahiri had executed a last Will and Testament by appointing her husband Ashis Ranjan Lahiri, since deceased as sole executor and in the event of her death, her daughter Smt. Monika Sarkar, the petitioner herein as the sole executrix of his last Will and Testament.

3. The mother of the petitioner expired on 28 June, 2014 leaving behind the following legal heirs :
i. Smt. Monika Sarkar .... Daughter ( Petitioner herein)
ii. Smt. Shibani Ganguly .... Daughter
iii. Smt. Kanika Bhattacharjee .... Daughter
iv. Radha Rani Chatterjee .... Daughter.

4. The father of the petitioner was the pre - deceased to his wife who died th on 27 March, 1982 leaving behind his wife and the above named four daughters as his legal heirs. After the death of the mother, the petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of probate of the last Will and testament dated 21 May, 1980.

5. While filing the instant application for grant of probate the petitioner has filed affidavit of assets and affidavit of the one of the attending witness namely Uttam Bhattacharyya.

6. None of the legal heirs of the deceased Sita Lahiri have filed any caveat and accordingly the petitioner has taken steps for issuance of general citations and special citations. By way of special citation, the petitioner has published the notice of the instant case in the English Daily News Paper namely Statesman and in the Bangla Daily News Paper namely Bartaman Patrika on 6 August, 2017 but in spite of publication of the notice no caveat is lodged.

7. The petitioner has examined two witnesses on commission to prove the last Will and Testament of the deceased Sita Lahiri namely:
i. Uttam Bhattacharyya - The attending witness of the Will.
ii. Smt. Monika Sarkar - The petitioner (Executrix).

8. Shri Uttam Bhattacharyya during his examination has identified the last Will and Testament dt. 21 May, 1980 and after identification, the Will is exhibited as Exhibit - 'A' and the signature of the Testatrix is exhibited as Exhibit - 'A / 1' and signature of the attesting witnesses are exhibited as A / 2, A / 3 and A / 4. The witness Uttam Bhattacharyya in his evidence stated that he was present at the residence of Sita Lahiri when she has executed the Will. He also stated that at the time of execution of the Will by Sita Lahiri, three attesting witnesses namely Shib Shankar Saha, Nemai Kumar Kundu and Tarapada Saha were also present and in his presence, the said attesting witnesses have signed in the said will at attesting witnesses. He further stated that except the petitioner, other three daughters were also present at the residence of the deceased. The witness also stated that at the time of execution of Will Sita Lahiri was perfectly healthy state, both physically and mentally.

9. The petitioner during her evidence has proved the death of her father and mother and the death certificate of the mother is marked as Exhibit - 'B'. She has also identified the signatures of her mother in the said Will and also stated that her mother was in fit state of mind.

10. In the instant case, none of the attesting witnesses were examined to prove the Will but the petitioner has examined the attending witness namely Uttam Bhattacharyya.

11. S.63 of the Succession Act reads as follows :
'63 Execution of unprivileged Wills. - Every testator, not being a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged in actual warfare, [or an airman so employed or engaged,] or a mariner











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top