Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Menaka, J
Sk. Roshan Ali v. Sk. Roshan Ali
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners lacked standing and proper objections for challenging delimitation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. judicial restraint applies to electoral matters; rules for objections and delimitation were correctly applied. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. electoral equality and representation are paramount in constituency delineation. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. the court emphasized non-interference in electoral delimitation under constitutional provisions. (Para 19) |
| 5. the writ petition was dismissed without any orders. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
1. The petitioners claim to be reputed persons and social workers who had earned respect from the masses living within the vicinity of Jhalda Darda Gram Panchayat. They feel responsible for the villagers. According to the petitioners, the villagers of Jhalda Darda Gram Panchayat were facing difficulties in enjoying the benefits of the government schemes, and as social workers, the petitioners approached the District Magistrate by filing a representation dated November 2, 2022 requesting delimitation of certain areas of the Jhalda Darda Gram Panchayat. In response to the representation, the petitioners were given a heari
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
