Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.
In re : Moumita Saha v.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim regarding vehicle ownership and its seizure. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on petitioner’s rights and conditions for interim custody. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court’s reasoning based on the ndps act and implications of release. (Para 8 , 9 , 12 , 13 , 15) |
| 4. discussion on procedural requirements for vehicle confiscation. (Para 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 5. dismissal of appeal. (Para 16) |
1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 20.10.2020 passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, 2nd Court, Jalpaiguri in connection with Jaigaon Police Station Case No. 57 of 2020 dated 18.02.2020 under the provisions of S.22(c) of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short NDPS Act), present application under S.482 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred.
2. By the impugned order, learned court below has been pleased to reject the petitioner's prayer for releasing the vehicle seized in connection with the said case. The petitioner contended that on 18.02.2020, the SI of Police lodged complaint stating that on the basis of source information complainant along with other police personnel went to the spot and intercepte
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
