IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
, J
Rithvik Bhattacharjee v. Eskay Tower Pvt. Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. abuse of process of law must be supported by clear legal grounds. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. factual disputes must be resolved at the trial level. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court must not interfere with merits during s.482 proceedings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. complaint proceedings were upheld; quashing denied. (Para 18 , 19) |
1. This is an application where petitioner has prayed for quashing of a proceeding, initiated under S.138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 (in short N.I. Act) being case No. 15876 of 2019, pending before learned Judicial Magistrate, 16th court, Calcutta. The grievance of the petitioner herein is that the aforesaid complaint under S.138 of the N.I. Act, filed by the opposite party, is amounting to complete abuse of the process of law since neither petitioner has any legal liability to be discharged against the respondent nor the petitioner had issued any cheque in favour of the respondent. The unfilled cheque in question was handed over to one Mr. Dileep Sing Mehata towards security to the amount paid by Mr. Mehata under the Memorandum of Understanding (in short MOU) dated 11.12.2009 executed between the petitioner and aforesaid Mahata with regard to one
Dashrath Bhai Trikam Bhai Patel. v. Hitesh mahanderaera Bai Patel and another
Bhushan Kumar and another v. State
Central Bank of India and Another v. Saxons Farms and Others
Suman Sethi v. Ajay K. Churiwala and Another
Pawan Kumar Ralli v. Maninder Singh Narula
Vijay Gopala Lahor v. Panduran Ramchandra Ghorpade and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.