SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 4753

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
, J
Rithvik Bhattacharjee v. Eskay Tower Pvt. Ltd.


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sengupta
For the Respondents: Mr. Satadru Lahiri

Table of Content
1. abuse of process of law must be supported by clear legal grounds. (Para 1 , 4)
2. factual disputes must be resolved at the trial level. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court must not interfere with merits during s.482 proceedings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. complaint proceedings were upheld; quashing denied. (Para 18 , 19)

1. This is an application where petitioner has prayed for quashing of a proceeding, initiated under S.138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 (in short N.I. Act) being case No. 15876 of 2019, pending before learned Judicial Magistrate, 16th court, Calcutta. The grievance of the petitioner herein is that the aforesaid complaint under S.138 of the N.I. Act, filed by the opposite party, is amounting to complete abuse of the process of law since neither petitioner has any legal liability to be discharged against the respondent nor the petitioner had issued any cheque in favour of the respondent. The unfilled cheque in question was handed over to one Mr. Dileep Sing Mehata towards security to the amount paid by Mr. Mehata under the Memorandum of Understanding (in short MOU) dated 11.12.2009 executed between the petitioner and aforesaid Mahata with regard to one

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top