SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 35

CULCUTTA HIGH COURT
, J
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Sitarani Jana and others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. K.K. Das
For the Respondents: Mr. Amit Ranjan Roy

1. By consent of Mr. K.K. Das, learned advocate for the appellant and Mr. Amit Ranjan Roy, learned advocate for the respondents, the appeal is treated as on day's list and is taken up for hearing.

2. The appeal and the cross appeal relate to the judgement and order dated 12th December, 2011 passed by the learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, 2nd Court, Tamluk in M.A.C. Case No. 05 of 2010 filed under S.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 .

3. The fact is the deceased, an employee of the KTPP, was born on 2nd July, 1955. On 9th July, 2009 he met with an accident and expired. At the time of death he was 54 years of age and was having monthly income of Rs. 13,332/-. After deducting the professional tax, the income of the deceased was Rs. 11,700/- per month. The Tribunal computed the annual income at Rs. 1,40,400/-. After deducting 1/3 towards personal expenses, which he would have spent had he been alive, it was computed at Rs. 83,000/-. Applying the multiplier of 11, the total loss of dependency was calculated at Rs. 10,29,600/- to which Rs. 2,500/- regarding loss of estate, Rs. 5,000/- for loss of consortium, Rs. 2000/- towards funeral expenses were added and the Tribunal a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top