SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 43

WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA
Judge, J
Dhruba Sen v. Tapasi Das


1. The instant Complaint under S.17 (inadvertently mentioned under S.12) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, the Act) is at the instance of an intending purchaser against the Developer / Builder (Opposite party No. 1) and the land owners (Opposite party Nos. 2 to 8) and the subsequent purchaser (OP No. 9) on the allegation on deficiency in service, primarily on the part of OP No. 1 / developer in a consumer dispute of housing construction.

2. Cut short of details, Complainant's case is that on 24.7.2011 he entered into an agreement with the OP No. 1 to purchase of a self - contained flat measuring about 900 sq. ft. super built up area on the top floor or premises No. 3, Doctor Lane, P.S. - Taltala, Kolkata - 700014 at a total consideration of Rs. 37,80,000. In terms of the said agreement, the complainant has paid a sum of Rs. 10,00,00 to OP No. 1 as part consideration amount. The complainant has stated that he could not make payment of second instalment in due time on account of his fund crunch. When the complainant narrated the same to OP No. 1. OP No. 1 disclosed that he sold out the subject flat to someone else and assured the complainant to sell the flat in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top